Are there too many categories in advertising awards? It’s a
debate that’s been rumbling on for several years as award shows have been
growing the number of categories to enter work into, both to keep up with
changes in the industry and to increase revenue.
Following a seminar at the London International Awards
Creative Conversations event in Las Vegas, Leo Burnett’s Global CCO fielded
questions from the audience. When asked about the proliferation of award show
categories he had this to say: “Categories have been created to keep pace with
the creative industry. Titanium was created by Dan Wieden because the BMW films
didn’t have anywhere to sit.”
“I would be looking at award shows as an opportunity to
learn,” he said, explaining that being able to delve into the likes of British
Airways’ Magic of Flying had given him the chance to re-assess the outdoor
medium. He also said it was important to appreciate excellence in execution
across all channels. Moreover, he argued, a wider range of categories also
allows for a more expansive understanding of creativity. “I’m all for an ‘and
then’ world rather than just having one way to look at it.”
Mark Tutssel and Leo Burnett are well known for their
rigorous internal reviews of work that borrow heavily from the lessons learned
judging countless award shows. As well as being a useful piece of quality
control it also allows him to monitor exceptional talent within the agency so
that deserving creatives can be nurtured and supported. “We’ve already
evaluated every piece of our work at the GPC (Global Product Committee) so when
it comes to LIA or Cannes I can tell you if a piece of work will win awards. I’m
never – or very rarely – surprised.”