LBB Editorial
Wed, 11 May 2016 14:29:19 GMT
Back in January I wrote about the lessons the advertising
world could learn from the worrying and inexorable march of Donald Trump
towards the Republican candidacy and – even – the presidency of the United
States. He’s dominated the narrative of the Republican race with his outrageous
proclamations, PR puppetry and unconventional media strategy, and now he’s the
last man standing. However alarming this is, I still maintain that there’s a
valuable moral lesson there about complacency – creative, strategic, executional.
Meanwhile over in the UK, the London mayoral race has offered up its own comms
lesson plans, albeit in a slightly less terrifying context…
The victory of Labour candidate Sadiq Khan is equally rich
for advertisers, marketers and comms people, if not a little (a lot) more
nuanced.
While red rag, controversy-stirring tactics have worked for
the Trump campaign, they did not do so well across the Atlantic. Towards the
last few weeks of the race, the campaign for Conservative candidate Zac Goldsmith got
really nasty. Goldsmith, Prime Minister David Cameron and pet media outlets tried
to paint Khan – a Muslim Briton, born and bred in London to Pakistani parents –
as a terrorist sympathiser, labelling him ‘extreme’ (extreme what? They
wouldn’t say, but expected the public to make that connection).
It failed miserably. Of course it did. Even Zac Goldmith’s
sister Jemima – former wife of Pakistani cricketer and politician Imran Khan –
came out to condemn little bro’s dirty tricks on Twitter.
But why did it fail where Donald Trump gets away with
insulting female journalists, slagging off the wives of his rivals, calling a
substantial proportion of the electorate ‘rapists’ and insisting that
wall-building constitutes smart international policy?
For one thing, the Goldsmith campaign completely misjudged
its audience. Trump can get away with his attention seeking proclamations
because he’s not just after the urban population of a major global economic
hub. He’s not running for Mayor of New York. New York, like London, is a
culturally diverse, cosmopolitan hub. Even those on the conservative side of
the spectrum have close ties with all sorts of people with all sorts of
nationalities and backgrounds.
It also underestimated Londoners’ sense of fairness. As a
moderate, fairly liberal man who has received fatwas and death threats because
of his support of gay marriage rights, lumping him in with Daesh was always
going to set off bullshit detectors. Londoners are surly and grumpy, but it’s a
sort of equal opportunity surliness. “I can barely tolerate you… but don’t
worry, I can barely tolerate anyone.” If you’re going to risk it with negative
and nasty campaigns, you ought to have some idea of how it will play in your
target audience, no?
And, here’s the big difference, it was desperate. It was off
brand. For Trump, with his red-purple face wobbling and short fingers pointing,
his strategy has been entirely consistent with his public persona. You might –
probably do – hate what he’s doing and saying, but it is convincingly
authentic. For mild-mannered Zac Goldsmith, bland but apparently ‘charming’, the
surge of nastiness was plain weird. His sudden attempts to shake off the racism
allegations by trying to cast himself as a friend of the Asian community were
at best embarrassing (check out this interview here)
at worst self destructive (like when the campaign tried to tell British Indiansthat Khan was after their gold jewellery).
The Goldsmith campaign complacently tried to nick some moves from Trump without ever stopping to consider whether they could pull it off.
If anything, it was Khan who ‘borrowed’ from the Donald
Trump approach to most success. He controlled the story – impressive when much
of the UK’s media was set against his embattled party, Labour. The Rise of the
The Donald has been the magnetically horrifying, unyielding narrative arc of
the US presidential campaign. And everyone knows that there’s no force in the
universe more powerful than a strong story in search of its natural conclusion.
Sadiq Khan had the gift of the son-of-a-bus-driver-becomes-London-Mayor
fairy tale, climbing to the top of the polls as if clambering up a beanstalk.
He pushed that story hard. I don’t think I read a single interview that didn’t
mention the bus driver father, the working class roots, the paper round, the
summers spent on building sites, the long hours studying for his law
qualifications while still sharing a bedroom with one of his seven siblings
until well into his twenties. See? I know his life story better than my
brother’s.
It was a story in search of a happy ending. It slotted in
with policy plaftorms that appealed to the struggles of low paid Londoners and
workers in the ‘squeezed middle’. But, even better, when his opposition started
to get personal in their attacks he had a readymade role for them: the villain.
They walked straight in. Woopsie.
For now, the fairy tale has reached its end and the real
work is about to start. Over the coming years, Londoners will get to get a
better idea of the truth behind the story. And more immediately, Sadiq Khan has
found himself drawn into Trump’s narrative orbit as the first Muslim mayor of a
major European city contemplates whether he’ll be able to get to the States any
time soon…